The SIFT descriptor is sensitive to the image added noise, as we can see in
figure 5.6 on page
. The classification rate was quite stable up to certain
,
.
At this point the clasification rate rapidly decreased and simpler SIFTs achieved better
classification rates for
in comparison to SIFT-GradWei SIFT. The initial classification
rate was around 90% for
, for
it was 88%, but for
it was only 66%.
Figure 5.4:
Images after noise addition. (a)
, (b)
|
Figure 5.5:
k-NN classifier sensitivity to image added noise
|
Figure 5.6:
In this picture we can see that SIFT discrimination power decreases with
increasing amount of noise. For
=0.3 the distribution is almost random (d); (a) original
image, (b) added noise,
, (c) added noise,
, (d) added noise,
|
Table 5.3:
Sensitivity to the image added noise(see figure 5.5 on page
)
noise ( ) |
SIFT-GradWei |
SIFT-Grad |
SIFT-Ori |
0.02 |
91.3 |
89.13 |
82.61 |
0.04 |
92.39 |
89.13 |
82.61 |
0.06 |
89.13 |
83.7 |
80.43 |
0.08 |
88.04 |
83.7 |
78.26 |
0.1 |
88.04 |
83.7 |
75 |
0.2 |
69.57 |
70.65 |
69.57 |
0.3 |
66.3 |
69.57 |
56.52 |
|
Kocurek
2007-12-17