Sensitivity to image added noise

The SIFT descriptor is sensitive to the image added noise, as we can see in figure 5.6 on page [*]. The classification rate was quite stable up to certain $v$, $v=0.1$. At this point the clasification rate rapidly decreased and simpler SIFTs achieved better classification rates for $v=0.3$ in comparison to SIFT-GradWei SIFT. The initial classification rate was around 90% for $v=0.02$, for $v=0.1$ it was 88%, but for $v=0.3$ it was only 66%.

Figure 5.4: Images after noise addition. (a) $v=0.02$, (b) $v=0.3$
\includegraphics[width=60mm,height=60mm]{truck-noise.eps}
Figure 5.5: k-NN classifier sensitivity to image added noise
\includegraphics[width=85mm,height=70mm]{truck-knn-noise.eps}
Figure 5.6: In this picture we can see that SIFT discrimination power decreases with increasing amount of noise. For $v$=0.3 the distribution is almost random (d); (a) original image, (b) added noise, $v=0.04$, (c) added noise, $v=0.1$, (d) added noise, $v=0.3$
\includegraphics[width=85mm,height=80mm]{SIFT-noise-instable.eps}

Table 5.3: Sensitivity to the image added noise(see figure 5.5 on page [*])
noise ($v$) SIFT-GradWei SIFT-Grad SIFT-Ori
0.02 91.3 89.13 82.61
0.04 92.39 89.13 82.61
0.06 89.13 83.7 80.43
0.08 88.04 83.7 78.26
0.1 88.04 83.7 75
0.2 69.57 70.65 69.57
0.3 66.3 69.57 56.52


Kocurek 2007-12-17